To anyone who is unfamiliar with this scenario, it goes like this: A woman goes through almost all of the steps of sexual reassignment surgery except for changing her reproductive organs. She/he then meets a woman and they decide to have a child. But, as opposed to biologically female of the two becoming impregnated, the transgendered one of the pair decides to have his wife impregnate him with a syringe of some sort.
Essentially, he is not a pregnant man, but a woman who claims to not be able to identify with any characteristics of the female sex and/or gender, except for one of the most defining roles a woman is capable of pursuing? It seems rather strange that he doesn't feel "female" enough to go through life resembling a woman but is able to identify to the point that he can carry a child?
It just strikes me as rather odd. He claims that it is a human right to have children and not a biologically female right, but if that was the case, men would be able to have children biologically, just as women do.
I am not one to argue against gender being a blurry concept up for much interpretation but biology and science are fundamentally concrete and I don't think that can be argued.
